Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 567

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE

..

The entry of FEH defines a different arrangement of fingers with repetitions of the initial figure than the one indicated by Chopin at the beginning of the bar. In accordance with what was said in the previous note, this arrangement seems to be more natural. In EE, Fontana gives only the fingering of the ending of the bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH

b. 567

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

3rd finger in FE (→GE,EE)

2nd finger as our alternative suggestion

..

According to us, the first of the Chopinesque fingering digits given in FE (→GE,EE) may be erroneous. In such passages, different sounds are generally played with different fingers, which together create a specific arrangement for a given passage, repeated in the next octaves (cf. bar 569). Therefore, it is generally enough to give fingering of the first figure as Chopin did, e.g. in the Etude in C Major, Op. 10 No. 1. Performing both g and a with the 3rd finger breaches this rule and impedes performance, not offering anything in exchange. However, if we perform g with the 2nd finger, which was just on the adjacent black key (f​​​​​​​), the 3rd finger may remain on a, which it played in the previous bar. Therefore, taking into account a possibility of a mistake, we give an alternative suggestion with the use of the 2nd finger.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in FE

b. 567-568

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur in bar 567 in FE

2 slurs in EE & GE3

Slur in bars 567-568 suggested by the editors

..

The missing slur over bar 568 must be considered an inaccuracy. The slur added in EE and GE3 is a revision that is easiest to implement in print. In the main text, we suggest a two-bar-long slur modelled after the authentic slur in analogous bars 216-217.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 567

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

​​​​​​​under 3rd semiquaver in FE (→EE)

​​​​​​​ under minim in GE

..

The shift of the ​​​​​​​ mark most probably resulted from lack of space in [A] ​​​​​​​under the stem of the minim in the L.H. In GE, the mark was placed in accordance with the pianistic sense, i.e. at the beginning of the bar.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 568-572

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we omit the unjustified sharps before f2 and f in bar 568, the F1-F octave in bar 570, F in bar 571 and f​​​​​​​ in bar 572. The accidentals were omitted also in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Last key signature sign