



Issues : GE revisions
b. 6-7
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE, cautionary naturals were added before g1 in the last chord in bar 6 and before the G-g octave in bar 7. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 7-8
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut, it is unclear from which note the slur begins. When interpreted literally, it seems to be encompassing three notes, from the e1 semiquaver. However, according to us, the shape of the line suggests that Chopin started writing it earlier, yet the ink did not flow out immediately. From the musical point of view, it would be a slur beginning already from the c2 quaver that would be most natural; however, reluctant to excessively intervene in the graphic image of music, in the main text we suggest a slur from the note that directly precedes its visible ending. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 12
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the part of the L.H. in Atut, a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||||||||
b. 13-14
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur in bar 13, which ends the line of the text in Atut, is written indistinctly – one can see only its beginning. Consequently, the mark was omitted in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), whereas the slur begins only just from bar 14. The revision introduced in GE3, a slur encompassing the entire first motif, like all subsequent ones, certainly corresponds to Chopin's intention, hence we include it in the main text (cf. prolonging the slurs in Atut in bars 14-15 and 17-18). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 13-16
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In Atut (→FE), there are no slurs in the L.H., which, taking into account the complete slurring of analogous bars 17-20, must be considered an inaccuracy of notation. Both in GE1 (→GE2) and EE, in the L.H. the slurs of the R.H. were repeated. In the main text, we also add slurs in the L.H.; however, we take into consideration the slur in bars 13-14, encompassing the entire motif and most probably intended by Chopin. Such a solution was introduced already in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |