Issues : GE revisions

b. 6-7

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In GE, cautionary naturals were added before gin the last chord in bar 6 and before the G-g octave in bar 7. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 7-8

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur from e1 in Atut, literal reading

Slur from g1 in Atut, interpretation suggested by the editors

No slur in FE (→EE)

Slur in bar 8 in GE

..

In Atut, it is unclear from which note the slur begins. When interpreted literally, it seems to be encompassing three notes, from the esemiquaver. However, according to us, the shape of the line suggests that Chopin started writing it earlier, yet the ink did not flow out immediately. From the musical point of view, it would be a slur beginning already from the cquaver that would be most natural; however, reluctant to excessively intervene in the graphic image of music, in the main text we suggest a slur from the note that directly precedes its visible ending.
The missing slur in FE (→EE) is most probably a result of the engraver's oversight. In GE, a slur was added after the authentic slur in the L.H. 

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 12

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the part of the L.H. in Atut, a  is present only next to d in the 1st octave. In FE, a  was added next to the bottom note of this octave, while in the remaining editions, it was added also next to d1.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , Inaccuracies in A

b. 13-14

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slurs in Atut, interpretation

Slur in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

Slur in GE3

..

The slur in bar 13, which ends the line of the text in Atut, is written indistinctly – one can see only its beginning. Consequently, the mark was omitted in FE (→EE,GE1GE2), whereas the slur begins only just from bar 14. The revision introduced in GE3, a slur encompassing the entire first motif, like all subsequent ones, certainly corresponds to Chopin's intention, hence we include it in the main text (cf. prolonging the slurs in Atut in bars 14-15 and 17-18). 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions

b. 13-16

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No L.H. slurs in Atut (→FE)

Slurs in bars 14-16 in GE1 (→GE2) & EE

Slurs in bars 13-16 in GE3

..

In Atut (→FE), there are no slurs in the L.H., which, taking into account the complete slurring of analogous bars 17-20, must be considered an inaccuracy of notation. Both in GE1 (→GE2) and EE, in the L.H. the slurs of the R.H. were repeated. In the main text, we also add slurs in the L.H.; however, we take into consideration the slur in bars 13-14, encompassing the entire motif and most probably intended by Chopin. Such a solution was introduced already in GE3

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions