|
b. 357
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FE (→GE1→GE2) is missing the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 357
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As before (bars 343 and 347) the engraver of EE arbitrarily used vertical accents here. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 357-358
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As before (bars 343-348) in both manuscripts Chopin used abbreviations to write down repeated R.H. triplets. In AsI he wrote all triplets except the first one in each bar in this manner, while in A all except the first two in bar 357 (most probably due to the slurs) and the first one in bar 358. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||||||||
|
b. 358-360
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Slur ending in GC (→GE) seems musically more accurate:
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 358
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The 1st finger on the 4th semiquaver is almost certainly a mistake of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) – the digit was most probably supposed to concern the next note (d1). The mistake was corrected in FED and FEH; an appropriate change was introduced also in GE3. In the latter and in FEH, in the further part of the passage, a few digits were added, clarifying the fingering indicated by Chopin at the beginning of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
before the 4th semiquaver, which we do not consider to be a mistake, since the 1st triplet is written an octave lower with an octave sign, and one can consider the 
3 at the beginning of the bar to be valid. The accidental was added in 
