|
b. 570-571
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Fontana's fingering is identical to the one indicated by Chopin in FED; it is just more accurately written out. In the main text, we include only the undoubtedly authentic entry of the composer. category imprint: issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |
||||||||
|
b. 570
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing wedge over the topmost note is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE, although one cannot exclude a later addition of the mark in the last phase of proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 570
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
GE1 (→GE2) overlooked the demisemiquaver beam in the beam of the 1st group of notes. The mistake was corrected in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 570
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, one can see traces of removal of the third category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 570-572
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Chopin could have decided to stop providing chords with arpeggios with the gradual fading of music (diminuendo started already in b. 567). Therefore, in the main text we leave the notation of A and of the majority of the sources without changes. However, taking into account the fact that the missing signs could have been a result of inaccuracy, we accept the use of the variant version of GE2 (→GE3). See also b. 568-572. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
. Chopin most probably reduced the dynamics from 
to 
. Shift of 
