mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 424-425

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 424

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the sources, there are no sharps before the d2 and d​​​​​​​3 semiquavers. It results from a different rule of validity of accidentals from the one applied generally in contemporary editions where a part of a bar is written with the use of an octave sign. In Chopin's times, a mark next to a note encompassed with an octave sign was often considered valid also for a note written at the same pitch, yet not encompassed with an octave sign.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 424

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In FE (→EE), there is no accidental before the 2nd semiquaver. A sharp necessary to achieve c​​​​​​​1, undoubtedly intended by Chopin in this case, was added in GE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE

b. 424

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In GE3, the  raising d1 to d​​​​​​​1 was overlooked (removed by mistake?).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 424-425

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur to quaver in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Shorter slur in GE3
..

The shorter slur is a result of an arbitrary action of the reviser of GE3 who probably took into consideration the slur in the R.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions