b. 380
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The traces of proofreading, visible in FE, reveal that the originally printed slur encompassed only the semiquavers in bar 380. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
b. 381
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We include the fingering of FEH in the main text, written probably by Chopin and confirmed by the Chopinesque entry in FED. In EE, Fontana gives the same fingering. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
b. 382
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Both fingerings could be coming from Chopin, yet their possible authenticity is unconfirmed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
b. 382
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the R.H. part, FE has only two naturals in the first semiquaver triplet. This inaccuracy, typical of Chopin, was corrected in the remaining editions – GE1 (→GE2) added a before the penultimate semiquaver of the bar, while EE and EE3 – also before the 7th semiquaver. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||||
b. 384-385
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing ties of the e2-e3 octave are most probably an oversight – cf. the analogous motifs in bars 381 and 383. Due to this reason, we suggest ties of this octave in the main text. Relevant additions were performed already in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |