b. 388
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 388
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FE does not contain any accidentals in the last semiquaver triplet. The patent inaccuracy was rectified in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 389
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), the 2nd half of the bar is written with the help of octave sign; at the same time, FE (→GE1→GE2) does not contain a single accidental therein. EE tried to correct the inaccuracy by adding sharps before e3 and a2 and a before d3. GE3 has the same notation we adopted in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 390-391
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, the meaning of the short diminuendo hairpin at the beginning of the 2nd half of the bar is unclear. The marks' size resembles long accents, yet they are placed directly under the 3rd semiquaver triplet. Therefore, we consider long accents or to be the most likely interpretations; the latter was adopted both in GE1 (→GE2) and EE. Extending each mark so that they cover a half of the bar is an arbitrary revision of GE3. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 390-391
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FE is missing the sharps raising e3 to e3. The accidentals were added in the remaining editions. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |