|
b. 384-385
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing continuation of the slur in the further part of the passage in the L.H. is most probably an inaccuracy, caused by difficulties in drawing or reproducing the slur encompassing the topmost semiquavers, written by Chopin under the R.H. on the bottom stave. Various additions to the slur of FE (→EE1,GE1→GE2) were proposed in EE2 (→EE3) and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 385
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The last octave in bar 385 having been moved an octave lower is a revision introduced in GE3, most probably to keep the general shape of the melody (however, one cannot rule out a common mistake). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 385
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 386
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The wedge in GE1 (→GE2) is most probably a mistake. On the other hand, one can ponder whether it could be the dots that were printed in FE by mistake in place of wedges. The main theme of this movement, out of which the motif of this and the next bar is derived, was being provided with both types of markings throughout the entire movement, yet in this fragment it is generally wedges that prevail; we can observe them, e.g. next to the bass notes in bars 386-388 and next to a chord in the R.H. in bar 387. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||
|
b. 386
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
