b. 448
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The digits added by Fontana specify hand position changes resulting from the fingering indicated in print by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 448
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
Both the change of a wedge for a dot over the L.H. quaver, and the lack of mark in the R.H. are most probably the result of negligence of the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 448-449
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
!!! ZMIENIĆ !!! In FE (→GE), the engraver placed two separate hairpin marks – the former in bar 448 and the latter in bar 449. It must be an inaccuracy of the engraver (cf. the marks in bars 450-451 and 452-453), most probably caused by the fact that in FE bar 449 a new line (missing endings of such elements of notation as slurs, dynamic hairpins, particularly when transitioning to a new line or page, are a frequent mistake of the editions). In EE, the reviser justly placed one mark. We suggest beginning the hairpin right after the mark. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
b. 448
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The lack of is probably an oversight by the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 448-449
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The absence of the slur in the L.H. is one of a few defects of this type in FE; in this case, it probably stems from the gap caused by the change of clef. The slur was added in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |