mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 446-447

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

EE overlooked the slur in the R.H., which must be a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 446-448

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slur in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

Slur in GE3, in bars 446-447

Slur to bar 448 suggested by the editors
..

As in the case of the previous phrase, we consider the missing slur in the L.H. to be an inaccuracy of notation and add a slur modelled after the authentic slur in bars 442-444. A slur added in GE3 to the source slur in bars 440-442.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 446-447

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 446

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Staccato dot in A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE)

No mark in GE2 (→GE3)
..

The missing staccato dot in GE2 (→GE3) is probably a revision, since the dot was also omitted in analogous b. 344 (in b. 336 and 438 the dot was absent already in FC and GE1).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 446

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No slur in sources

Slur suggested by the editors
..

In the main text we add a slur over the 2nd and 3rd crotchets after the authentic slurs in analogous b. 438 and 453.

category imprint: Editorial revisions