Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 288-289

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

In FE, there are visible traces of proofreading of the slur – originally, both bars had identical slurs, encompassing only the 1st halves of each of them. As a result of proofreading, undoubtedly Chopinesque, the slur in bar 289 begins earlier, encompassing the last two notes of bar 288. 

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 288

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Arpeggio in GE

No mark in FE (→EE)

..

Like in analogous b. 55, it seems unlikely that Chopin would have wanted to forgo an arpeggio in this figure. The missing arpeggio in FE could be explained by an oversight in the basis or by it having been entered into [A] after [FC] (→FE) had been finished.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 289

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Slurs in A & GE2

Slur in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

It is difficult to qualify the replacement of three two-note slurs of A with a whole-bar slur in GE1 as a mistake or a result of a routine approach of the engraver. It also does not seem to be a proofreading, understood as a change of the slurring of A. According to us, the following hypothesis is likely – the engraver initially printed the bar without any slurs (he also overlooked all staccato dots), which was perhaps corrected by Chopin, by adding one slur. In the main text we give the slurs of A, whose authenticity is unquestionable. They were also introduced in GE2.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of GE

b. 289

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

3 staccato dots in A & GE2

No marks in GE1 (→FE)

L.H. dots in EE

..

In GE1 (→FE) there is none of the three staccato dots written in A (under both bass notes and over the top most note in the R.H.), which is undoubtedly a mistake. EE added the signs in the L.H. (also in the next bar), most probably on the basis of comparison with the corresponding bar of the exposition. GE2 reproduced the notation of A.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 289

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Long accents in A

Short accents in GE (→FEEE)

..

Replacing long accents with short ones is a typical inaccuracy of GE (→FEEE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE