b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In GE1 (→GE2), the 8th semiquaver is a d2. It is a result of two overlapped mistakes – the missing octave sign (see the previous note) and the Terzverschreibung error, which is confirmed by the comparison with analogous bars 287 and 303-304. The mistakes were corrected in GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with analogous bars 287 and 303-304 points to an inaccurate placement of the mark in FE (→EE). A corresponding correction was introduced already in GE. In turn, in EE, another mark was added at the beginning of the bar, which is both an arbitrary and incomprehensible revision if we take into account the compliance with the harmonic course, confirmed in the analogous bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest a slur modelled after analogous bar 304. The change was introduced already in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add a long accent after bar 304 as well as 287 and 303. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
The slur under the first half of the bar is an arbitrary addition by the reviser of EE2 (→EE3). They possibly took into account the beginning of the analogous phrase in bar 136. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |