Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In GE1 (→GE2), the 8th semiquaver is a d2. It is a result of two overlapped mistakes – the missing octave sign (see the previous note) and the Terzverschreibung error, which is confirmed by the comparison with analogous bars 287 and 303-304. The mistakes were corrected in GE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions

b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 on 3rd beat in FE

 on 2nd beat in GE

 in EE

..

A comparison with analogous bars 287 and 303-304 points to an inaccurate placement of the  mark in FE (→EE). A corresponding correction was introduced already in GE. In turn, in EE, another  mark was added at the beginning of the bar, which is both an arbitrary and incomprehensible revision if we take into account the compliance with the harmonic course, confirmed in the analogous bars.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

Slur in GE3

..

In the main text, we suggest a slur modelled after analogous bar 304. The change was introduced already in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)

Long accent added by the editors

..

In the main text, we add a long accent after bar 304 as well as 287 and 303. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 288

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

No slur in FE (→GE,EE1)

Slur in EE2 (→EE3)

..

The slur under the first half of the bar is an arbitrary addition by the reviser of EE2 (→EE3). They possibly took into account the beginning of the analogous phrase in bar 136.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions