mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 208

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Grace note in A (→GE) & FED

Grace note after minim in FE

Crotchet in EE
..

The d2 appoggiatura, in FE placed erroneously on the right-hand side of the minim, was misinterpreted in EE as a crotchet in the reduction of the orchestra part, which is also a patent mistake. Chopin introduced the correct text in FED. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED

b. 208-209

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

No slur in sources

Slur suggested by the editors
..

In the main text we add the slur in the part of the L.H. Chopin probably considered the slur over the crotchets in the R.H. to be referring to the entire block of the harmonic filling.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 208

composition: Op. 19, Bolero

 
 
 

Our variant suggestion
 
..

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 208

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur from first octave in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur from 2nd octave suggested by the editors
..

In this context, two identical octaves at the beginning of the bar, the slur of the sources is almost certainly inaccurate. It could have been the revisers or even Chopin himself that did not notice it due to the enharmonic change of B1-B to A1-A.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 208-209

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

 in FE (→EE)

 in bar 209 in GE1 (→GE2)

Shifted  in GE3
..

A later beginning of the ​​​​​​​ mark in GE1 (→GE2) must be an inaccuracy resulting from having divided these bars into two great staves. GE3 prolonged the mark yet did not repeat its range from FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies