|
b. 287-288
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI and A, accidentals were put only next to the top notes of the octaves – a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||
|
b. 288-291
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of GC |
||||||
|
b. 288-289
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The tie sustaining d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A (→GE1→FE) there are no accidentals in the last group of semiquavers. In EE the necessary category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||
|
b. 288
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Combining the slurs over the rest in bar 288, as it was done in GE1 (→FE→EE), may be considered to be justified in this case – the slurs in A look like an inaccurately written one slur. In GE2 the manuscript was interpreted correctly. In turn, in the very A the slurring of the junction of the bars, which are written on adjacent pages, is unclear. The slur in bar 288 suggests a continuation, which is not excluded at all by the slur in bar 289. However, when discussed separately, the second slur seems to be a typical slur combining a grace note with a semiquaver associated with it, hence we consider such an interpretation to be more likely and we adopt it as the text of A and the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
to a
in bar 287 and naturals to e3, e and a 
returning f2 on the last semiquaver was added, whereas in 
