mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 288

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

There is no accidental before the 7th quaver in the sources, which makes us interpret it as f1. The oversight of a  returning f1 is proved by f1 present in the viola part in Morch. In the corresponding bar of the exposition (bar 140), Chopin wrote in the 1st half of the bar c and e1 instead of d and f1, as a result of which a  next to f1 is not necessary there.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions

issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A

b. 288

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In FE (→EE1→EE2) there is no  raising a1 to a1 before the 2nd semiquaver. Chopin added a  in FED; the correct text was introduced also in EE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED

b. 288

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

f-f1 in A (→GE) & FE2 (→EE)

d-d1 in FE1
..

The version of FE1 must be erroneous, which is proved by a comparison with analogous bars 286 and 290 as well as by the proofreading of FE2 (→EE), perhaps originated by Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

b3 in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)
 
..

Bars 288 and 304 are a repetition, modified accordingly, of bars 287 and 303 that precede them. Out of these 4 bars, it is only bar 288 that features the b3 note as the topmost one, which implies a possibility of a mistake. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest an a3, like in the remaining bars. Such a correction was introduced already in GE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 288

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The middle part of the bar, from the 3rd to the 8th note, is written in FE (→EE) with the use of an octave sign. In GE1 (→GE2), the mark was overlooked, as a result of which a corresponding fragment seems to be written an octave lower. The mistake was rectified in GE3 by moving the notes to the right pitch, like it was written in all editions in analogous bar 304.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions