



b. 152
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The wedge of GE is probably a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Wedges |
||||||||
b. 152-154
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In spite of differences, the indications of both sources probably represent the same fingering. A possible difference may concern only the 1st semiquaver of bar 152 – the missing marking in EE suggests the use of the 2nd finger, which is more natural for this scheme. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 152
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In A (→GC,FE) the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , FE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 152-154
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in b. 20-22, in FC the slur was extended by Chopin. The doubled ties in EE are an arbitrary revision, quite frequently applied in that edition. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||
b. 152
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we suggest a long accent after an analogous situation in b. 150. The mark was also added in EE; however, a short accent was used (like in the vast majority of cases). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |