b. 199
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The flat, in A (→GE) restoring b, is placed before c1 in FE (→EE1→EE2). The mistake was corrected in EE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 199
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The Chopin was reproduced in GE1 (→FE→EE) as and . This kind of misinterpretations of would often appear in Chopin's pieces, e.g. in the Etude in E minor, Op. 10 No. 6, bar 21. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , fz – f |
|||||
b. 199
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In EE3, a slur combining E and the ending of the trill was arbitrariily added. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 199-201
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing staccato dots at the beginning of bar 197 (in both hands) and 199 can be almost certainly attributed to the inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). The signs were added in GE2 after A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 199-201
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In A bar 199 is the last one on the page, which contributed to the fact that the range of the slur in the L.H. is vague – the slur started in this bar suggests continuation, yet there is no ending thereof on the next page. The inaccuracy was corrected in GE1 (→FE→EE), perhaps at Chopin's request; however, it is questionable that he would be thinking about a slur that would not embrace the last note of this scale passage (cf. the slurs in the R.H. in this place). Due to this fact, it is the slur led to the beginning of bar 201, in accordance with GE2, that we adopt to the main text. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE , Corrected slurs of Op. 21 in GE1 |