data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
In spite of differences, the indications of both sources probably represent the same fingering. A possible difference may concern only the 1st semiquaver of bar 152 – the missing marking in EE suggests the use of the 2nd finger, which is more natural for this scheme.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Annotations in teaching copies, EE revisions, Annotations in FEH
notation: Fingering