|
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FEH, the fingering was indicated more accurately in bar 24, in FED – here. In the main text, we include it for the first time, i.e. in bar 24. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||
|
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) may be inaccurate – neither in analogous bar 24 nor in the two remaining places in which Chopin used rests in the main theme of this movement of the Concerto (bar 38 and 54) the rest is encompassed with a slur. Therefore, we may be dealing with a mistake or a remaining element of the original version – cf. the 1st movement of the Concerto, bar 197. Therefore, the shortened slur of GE3 may be considered a justified attempt to reproduce the notation of [A]. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 33-37
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we give the fingering digit written in bar 33 in FED. The same fingering, marked more accurately, is to be found four bars later in FEH. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||
|
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the slur in the R.H., which started in bar 32, does not have an ending here, i.e. on a new line. The defect was corrected in EE and GE3. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in GE |
||||||||||
|
b. 34-36
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
EE reproduced the distinct long accents of FE (→GE1→GE2) as short. In GE3, the mark in bar 34 was changed to a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
3 in 
in bar 34 in