|
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur over this group of semiquavers must be considered inadvertence – it is encompassed with a slur in all analogous bars. In the main text, we add a slur after bar 55 and 95. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 23-24
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The fingering of FEH, which is not written by Chopin's hand, yet it may come from a lesson with the composer, is based on a different idea than the fingering indicated by Chopin in FED. In the further part of bar 24, both fingerings are much more compliant. Fontana's fingering in EE significantly differs from the indications included in FED; in turn, the discrepancy with respect to FEH concerns only the 2nd and 3rd semiquavers in bar 23. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing pedalling in the 1st half of the bar is rather an inaccuracy – in almost identical bar 31, the markings are present in all sources. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Due to the fact that the octave sign used to write the 1st half of the next bar was started too early, the last semiquaver in FE is an erroneous f category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 23-24
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In GE3, the slur was arbitrarily extended. There is a similar situation in bars 31-32. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
] suggested by the editors
4. The mistake was corrected both in 
