b. 17-29
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The final concept for articulation of the first theme developed only just at the stage of proofreading of FE. That edition reveals traces of removal of the slurs combining the 2nd quaver with the subsequent crotchet in bar 17 and 29 and the slur over the first two quavers in bar 21. Therefore, it was most probably only just then that at least some of the wedges were added. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 18-23
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing marks in bars 18-19 and 22-23 in GE suggest that they were added by Chopin during the last proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, the mark is placed inaccurately, so that it looks like it were to be valid only just from the 4th quaver. GE correctly interpreted the mark (in accordance with analogous bar 22, 26 and 30). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 18
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur of FE (→GE1→GE2) is most probably inaccurate – in all analogous places, the respective slur begins earlier, from the first or second semiquaver. In the main text, we adopt the former solution (introduced also in GE3) – see bar 30. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The simultaneous sounding of the second grace-note with the L.H. chord was marked by Chopin in FED. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Synchronization markings |