Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 187

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur from b2 in FE (→GE1GE2)

Slur from b1 in EE & GE3

..

A comparison with the slurs of similar figures of this section (from bar 179) proves that the slur of FE (→GE1GE2) is inaccurate, which, actually, could have had its origin in the careless notation of [A]. In the main text, we include the corresponding correction introduced in EE and GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 189-191

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 189

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE

Fingering written into FEH

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH

b. 190

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

e2 in FE (→EE) & GE3

e2 in GE1 (→GE2)

..

The version of GE1 (→GE2) – certainly erroneous, cf. bars 186, 541 and 545 as well as 182 and 537 – probably came into being as a result of an overzealous action of the reviser who added here cautionary naturals before the ggrace notes. The mistake was corrected in GE3

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 190

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE

Fingering written into FED

..

Fontana's fingering is almost certainly identical with the indication in FED, stemming from a lesson with Chopin. In that copy, apart from the evident digit '2,' written twice in a way typical of FED, first by Chopin, then by Madame Dubois, there is a visible delicate line next to the aquaver. The mark could be interpreted as a digit '1,' yet it is uncertain, hence in the main text, we give only the '2' described above.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED