b. 187
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison with the slurs of similar figures of this section (from bar 179) proves that the slur of FE (→GE1→GE2) is inaccurate, which, actually, could have had its origin in the careless notation of [A]. In the main text, we include the corresponding correction introduced in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 189-191
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 189
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE1 (→GE2) – certainly erroneous, cf. bars 186, 541 and 545 as well as 182 and 537 – probably came into being as a result of an overzealous action of the reviser who added here cautionary naturals before the g2 grace notes. The mistake was corrected in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Fontana's fingering is almost certainly identical with the indication in FED, stemming from a lesson with Chopin. In that copy, apart from the evident digit '2,' written twice in a way typical of FED, first by Chopin, then by Madame Dubois, there is a visible delicate line next to the a1 quaver. The mark could be interpreted as a digit '1,' yet it is uncertain, hence in the main text, we give only the '2' described above. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |