b. 181-182
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add cautionary naturals before the d2 grace note in bar 181 and c2 in bar 182. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 181
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE1 (→GE2) must be erroneous – cf. analogous bar 536. The engraver must have looked, by mistake, at the line below and placed here the ending of bar 185, looking alike. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 182
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 182-183
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Like the last digit in bar 141, the '2' written in FEH may be considered to be Chopinesque, hence we include it in the main text. It implies a different fingering than the one given by Fontana in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Differences in fingering , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 185
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The chord on the last beat has three elements in the sources in bar 185, whereas in analogous bar 540, there are four elements. According to us, it does not provide any guarantee that Chopin indeed wanted to diversify this detail. Both versions sound good, hence the composer could have hesitated at the time of choosing one of them. This, in turn, could have resulted in deletions impeding the interpretation of [A] or in an accidental oversight of a proofreading of one of these places, which would happen to Chopin quite frequently (cf. e.g. the Sonata in B minor, op. 35, the 2nd mov., bars 10-11 or the Mazurka in G minor, op. 24, no. 1, bars 26-27). In this situation, we suggest the four-note version of this chord as an acceptable variant, enabling the performance of the same text in both places. category imprint: Editorial revisions |