Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 195

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Arpeggio sign in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE

..

In GE, there is no apreggio mark before the 2nd chord of the bar, which is most probably an oversight of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 195-210

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

category imprint:

b. 196-198

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE

..

Out of the two digits visible in FEH in analogous places in bars 196 and 198, in the main text we include only the first one, written probably by Chopin. This entry confirms Fontana's fingering, at least in its part from the 3rd to the 6th semiquaver in bar 196.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH

b. 197

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Continuous slur in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

Separate slurs in FED & GE3

..

The unbroken – in spite of the rest – slur of FE (→EE,GE1GE2) must be a remaining part of the original version of the rhythm (with semiquavers without rest). The need to separate the first two notes from the following semiquavers was confirmed by Chopin with additional marks written in pencil in FED – a slashed line, underlining the significance of the rest (also in bar 201), as well as a slur over the first two semiquavers. Taking that into account, in the main text, we divide the slur, adjusting the phrasing to the rhythmic notation.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , GE revisions , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Inserted rest

b. 197-201

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In FE, the visible traces of proofreading in bars 197, 199 and 201 (as well as 556) show that Chopin changed the rhythmic values of the 2nd and 3rd notes – in the removed version, the 2nd note was a semiquaver, whereas the third one – a demisemiquaver.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Inserted rest