|
b. 190
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, there is no accidental before the penultimate semiquaver. In this situation, the absence of a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 192-193
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur must be an inaccuracy – slurs are present over all previous appearances of similar figures as well as in the analogous place in the recapitulation (bars 547-548). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 193
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Both source fingerings are generally concordant – the only doubt concerns the continuation of the fingering in the L.H. in FEH (the concordance is perfect with complementary indications in analogous bar 548). However, their possible authenticity is uncertain. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 193
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest including the accent placed in the respective bar in the recapitulation (bar 548). category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 195
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
There is no indication that the version of GE could be possibly authentic; it is most probably a typical example of the Terzverschreibung error. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
is a patent mistake, corrected both in 
