mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 364

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

No mark in A (→GE→FE)

Short accent in EE

Long accent suggested by the editors
..

According to us, the missing accent in A (→GE→FE) must be considered an inaccuracy; Chopin wrote accents in all 16 analogous figures (bars 178-183, 258, 260, 354-362 and 495-501).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 364

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

g2 in chord in FE (→EE)

a2 in chord in GE
..

The mistake of FE (→EE) is proved by a comparison with analogous bars 363 and 367-368 (see also bars 39-40) as well as by the orchestral part, in which in oboe I there is an a2 and not g2. The revision of GE was most probably based on the aforementioned analogy.   

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 364

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Wedge in FE (→EE)

Staccato dot in GE
..

In GE, the wedge was arbitrarily changed to a staccato dot.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 364

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fingering written into FED

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE
..

Single fingering digits in FED and EE complement the Chopinesque indications contained in FE (→GE,EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED

b. 364

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No sign in FE (→GE,EE)

[] suggested by the editors
..

According to us, a  hairpin in the next bar and pairs of   marks in similar, two-bar passages in bars 356-357, 358-359 and 366-367 prove a highly likely oversight of the  mark in this bar. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a ​​​​​​​ mark after analogous bar 356.

category imprint: Editorial revisions