data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
GE1
compare
According to us, a hairpin in the next bar and pairs of
marks in similar, two-bar passages in bars 356-357, 358-359 and 366-367 prove a highly likely oversight of the
mark in this bar. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a
mark after analogous bar 356.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Editorial revisions
notation: Articulation, Accents, Hairpins