|
b. 599
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur must be considered an inaccuracy in this place, even if it happened to Chopin in [A]. It is proved by slurs in subsequent bars, filled with typical, conventional (although not routine) figures. There is a similar situation in bars 607-608. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 599-623
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 600-603
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
Those obvious inaccuracies in the three editons obscure deciphering Chopin's intentions regarding slurring of the part. In the main text we present the slurs notated without clear faults in GC. They represent possible articulationn of the chords progression. While interpreting the slur in # EE we assume that the error applies to b. 600 (half of the line spanning bars 598-600 has no slurs in EE). We retain the slurs in GE as despite the inaccurate copy of the basis (GC) they are formally correct. The FE slurs may be interpreted in a variety of ways, among others as distorted GC slurs or as the aforementioned. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 600-620
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I category imprint: |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 600
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we lead the slur from the previous bars to the very end of the phrase. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
