mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 271

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Accent in A & GE2

No mark in GE1 (→FE→EE)
..

The missing accent is a patent oversight of GE1 (→FE→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 271

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

 in A

No sign in GE (→FE→EE)
..

The  hairpin is poorly visible in A from under the poco ritenuto indication. The engraver of GE1 (as well as the reviser of GE2) could have not noticed it or even considered that the indication had been written with an intention to replace (cross out) the  sign.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 271

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Hairpin in FE (→EE)

Hairpin from 2nd quaver in GE
..

In GE, the ​​​​​​​ hairpin starts from the 2nd quaver. It is a minor inaccuracy of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 271

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

FE (→EE1→EE2) lacks ​​​​​​​ raising a1 to a1. The patent mistake was corrected in GE and EE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in EE

b. 271

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

We add cautionary flats before e and e1 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions