|
b. 271
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In FE, the indication dim. was omitted – only the dashes delimiting its scope were left. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 271-272
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
In GE1 the last of the slurs encompassing the three-note motifs was overlooked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 271-272
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Over the part of the R.H. (in some editions under), apart from the top, several-bar-long slur, the sources include one or two additional slurs of varied range. According to us, it is most probably only the slur of A that is authentic, hence we give it in the main text. The absence of visible traces of corrections of slurs in GE1 makes a possible Chopin proofreading highly unlikely, whereas the subsequent minor changes of the range of the first slur, of inaccurate (FE) or revisional (EE and GE2) nature and actually without impact on the performance, cannot be authentic. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 271
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||||
|
b. 271
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
in 