



b. 271
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
This bar was not written out with notes in the manuscripts, only marked in an abridged manner as a repetition of b. 38. Taking into account the above, in the main text we suggest supplementing the Chopinesque pedalling on the 3rd beat of the bar, like in b. 38. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 271-272
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The precise Chopinesque articulation markings – wedges at the beginning of the bar and dots further on – were arbitrarily standardised in GE (→FE,EE). It was the entire finale of the Variations that was subject to this arbitrary unification of staccato markings. According to us, such a decision could have been influenced by both types of staccato intertwining in A, doubly burdensome for the engraver:
The missing staccato mark over the crotchet in bar 271 is most probably the engraver's mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||
b. 271
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
A cautionary flat to e category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
||||||
b. 271
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A Chopin initially wrote an e category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
||||||
b. 271
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text we suggest adding an accent after the previous two passages (bar 267 and 269). The mark was also added in GE (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |