mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 315

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

Similarly as in bar 311, Chopin wrote the necessary naturals in A (→GE1→FE) only in the first triplet (in both hands). In this bar, the necessary additions were introduced only in EE and GE2.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 315-316

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Slur to bar 316 in A

Slur in bar 315 in GE1 (→FE)

Slurs in bar 315 in EE

Slurs to bar 316 in GE2
..

Same as in bars 311-312, a shorter slur in GE1 (→FE) must be an inaccuracy, typical in this composition. EE added a similar slur in the L.H. In GE2 the slur was extended on the basis of A and an analogous one was added in the part of the L.H.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions

b. 315-316

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slurs in FE (→GE,EE)

Slurs written into FED
..

In the main text, we include the slurs added in FED, running from the 2nd semiquaver to the octave on the 2nd beat of the bar. According to us, it specifies the notation and harmonises with the printed notation – cf. the slurs in the L.H. in these bars and the slur in the R.H. in bar 317.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Authentic post-publication changes and variants

b. 315-316

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 in FE (→EE)

 in GE1 (→GE2)

 in GE3
..

In FE (→EE), the placement of the  marks suggests that the first one concerns the R.H., whereas the second one, the L.H. Since it does not seem likely that such differentiation could be intended by Chopin in this context, both marks are probably misplaced. In the main text, we move them to between the staves, since, according to us, they refer to both hands. Changes striving in that direction were gradually introduced in GE1 (→GE2) and GE3. See also the adjacent note.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Placement of markings , GE revisions

b. 315-316

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 under L.H. part in sources

 suggested by the editors
..

Just like in the case of the  marks, assigning both  marks to the L.H. is most probably a result of lack of space between the staves of FE.

category imprint: Editorial revisions