b. 314
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The half-bar slurs of GE1 (→FE→EE) are certainly an inaccuracy in reproducing A – cf. bar 312, in which the same slurs of A were reproduced correctly in the editions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 314
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a slur in the L.H. after similar bar 298. Such a slur was added already in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
b. 314
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The traces visible in FE prove that, originally, the top voice was led differently: . It is the slur, removed at the time of that proofreading, that particularly draws attention – one can ponder whether it was not supposed to be adapted to the new shape of the melody and not to be removed. However, uncertain as to the range of a possible slur, we do not suggest any addition. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Main-line changes |
||||||||||
b. 314
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
b. 314-315
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the accent and the hairpin, which Chopin (most probably) added while proofreading FE (or earlier, in the basis for that edition). The missing accent in EE is most probably an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |