|
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As with bar 216, the interpretation of the staccato markings in A is problematic, since the difference between the particular markings, so clear in bars 208-211 (wedges and dots), concerns only the size of the markings in this case – the dots over the 1st and 3rd semiquavers are clearly bigger than those over the 2nd and 4th ones. We consider it a consequence of carelessness and interpret it after the initial bars in this variation. In the main text we suggest adding respective markings in the L.H. part as well. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A the length of both accents is not much different, yet a comparison with analogous bar 228 and 230, as well as 311, 313 and 315, allows us to consider this difference to be significant, hence in the main text we first give a short accent and then a long one. In GE both marks were interpreted as long accents. The absence of the accents in FE (→EE1) proves that they were added to A later, after [FC] had been finished. In EE2 the marks were added on the basis of GE1, interpreting them as common, short accents. See also bar 226 and 228-230. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
As before, in the 2nd half of the bar Chopin did not write accidentals in the R.H. part in A (→GE1). This version was also repeated by FE1, while FE2 (→EE) added both naturals. GE2 added only the latter (a3), probably assuming that a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , FE revisions , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 224-225
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we do not include the inauthentic R.H. part fingering added by EE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 224-225
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the L.H. part in EE1 in bar 224 the text of the next bar was printed (without performance markings and the ledger line for the 2nd crotchet). It resulted in an erroneous, although acceptable in terms of pitch, text in bar 244 (c category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
to a2 is not necessary, since in the 1st half of the bar there are naturals both to a1, written at the same pitch as the discussed note, and to a2.
-c