



b. 225
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FEH, a '1' was initially written over the 2nd quaver (by mistake? – cf. bar 228), which was then changed to a '5'. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 225-226
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In FC (→GE1) Chopin wrote here two one-bar pedals. According to us, it is an oversight of the composer, who wrote one two-bar pedal in analogous b. 93-94, in accordance with the harmonic sense. Due to the above reason, we suggest that version in the main text. Chopin committed such a mistake also in b. 213-214, where the superfluous pedal change was yet noticed and crossed out. A two-bar pedal was introduced in GE2; however, GE3 restored the notation of FC. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FC , Alterations in CF |
||||||
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
FE are lacking in the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The missing dot next to the b minim in FE (→EE) is probably an oversight by the copyist or the engraver (cf. b. 166). However, the dot is also absent in AImaz, which, in case of an alternative filiation, may indicate that [A2] did not include a dot. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |