Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 168

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

Pedalling in A, EEC, EEW2, GE2op (→GE3op) & #GE3no2

No markings in FE (→GE1op,GE1no2,EEW1)

..

The absence of pedalling in this bar is undoubtedly a mistake of the engraver of FE (→GE1op,GE1no2,EEW1). At the last appearance of this section, more mistakes in reproduction of the pedalling were committed in FE, which may be related to the necessity of working on two pages of the manuscript at the same time (cf. bars 173-174 and 188).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions

b. 168

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

The natural before the 2nd quaver in the L.H. (d), overlooked in A (→GE1FE), was added in EE and GE2.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A

b. 168

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

5 quavers in FE (→EE)

4 semiquavers in GE

..

The notation of GE may be a revision or the original version, corrected in the last phase of retouching FE (→EE). In similar contexts, Chopin would use both the notation with a written-out first note of the ornament and without; he would also use, sometimes interchangeably, small quavers or semiquavers (cf. the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, the 2nd mov., bar 33 and 82 as well as bar 20 and 88). Therefore, both notations could be authentic, although in one of the mentioned examples (bar 33), the editor changed quavers to semiquavers. See also bar 523.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 168-172

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

cre - scen - do in FE (→EE)

cresc. in GE

..

In the main text, we adopt the notation of crescendo of FE (→EE). In GE, the division into syllables and the dashes marking the range of the dynamic change were overlooked.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 168

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

No sign in AI, GE & EE

in AF

Long accent in FE

..

Just like in analogous b. 160, in the main text we reproduce the mark of AF. The long accent in FE may result from Chopin's proofreading, which is indicated by the fact that EE does not contain any mark.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Long accents , Scope of dynamic hairpins , Authentic corrections of FE