b. 138
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Both accents in A are typical long accents, which was not reproduced in the editions. Moving the first under the 3rd quaver is almost certainly a mistake of the engraver of FE (→EE), who adapted this half of the bar to the adjacent ones. In the main text we move the first accent over f2, in accordance with the notation used by Chopin in the recapitulation (bar 285), more accurate according to us. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
b. 138
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In FE, the raising d1 to d1 was overlooked. The patent mistake was corrected in the remaining editions. The mark was added also in FEH. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||
b. 138-139
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Atut ends in bar 138 with a mark indicating the place where it is incorporated into the main base text of FE (lost), which was most probably an autograph of the entire Concerto in the version for solo piano ([A]), independent or written into a hand-written score. From bar 139 on, there are no manuscripts among the sources of this movement of the Concerto. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Incomplete sources |
|||||||||
b. 138
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Not only was the first quaver in GE1 (→GE2) provided with a staccato dot, repeated after FE, but also – erroneously – with an additional crotchet stem. The resulting nonsensical combination was entirely omitted in GE3. In the main text, we give a wedge in this place – see the note on bars 137-140. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 138-142
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Having marked articulation of the sixth ending the passage in analogous bars 130 and 134 twice, Chopin could have considered it to be obvious in bars 138 and 142. In addition, taking into account the possibility of oversights, we suggest wedges in those bars in the main text. The marks were added also in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |