|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
A comparison with analogous b. 34, 60 and 293 suggests that the ending of the trill could have been overlooked here (perhaps by Chopin himself). Due to the above reason, we suggest a suitable addition in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 110-111
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
The fact that the top note of the 5th L.H. crotchet is to be held must be a Chopinesque addition introduced in the stage of proofreading FE (→GE,EE) into both these bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
|
b. 110-112
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A, the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , FE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 110
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text, we omit the additional slur encompassing the triplet, present in all sources – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 16. In the next bar, a respective slur is missing. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Triplet slurs |
|||||||
|
b. 110-122
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The notation of FE, with the demisemiquaver going beyond the 3rd note of the semiquaver triplet (in b. 110, 120 and 122), is contrary to the Chopinesque understanding of this kind of combination of a dotted rhythm with a triplet – see the note on b. 45-46. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Dotted rhythms and triplets , FE revisions |
raising b
to b in b. 110 and 112 is missing. The patent inaccuracy was corrected in 
