Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 110-111

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No markings in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

Dots & slur in GE3

..

GE3 arbitrarily marked articulation of all semiquavers – the majority – staccato, two – legato.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 110

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

GE3 arbitrarily added a slur over the first two semiquavers of the 2nd half of the bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 110-111

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

No slur in A (→GC,FE)

Slur in EE

Slur in GE

..

The L.H. slurs added in EE & GE are certainly inauthentic.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 110-112

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No markings in A (→FCGE1)

Pedalling in FE (→EE)

Pedalling in GE2 (→GE3)

..

The pedalling in these bars was added later: undoubtedly by Chopin in the proofreading of FE (→EE). However, one can have doubts whether the intention of Chopin's proof entry was interpreted correctly, since there is no reason to release pedals in the middle of the bar instead of at the end of it, like in all the remaining bars. Consequently, in the main text we give the version of GE2 (→GE3) modelled after the Chopinesque entry in FC in analog. b. 242-244.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 110-114

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

Long accents in AF, literal reading

Short accents in FE (→EE) & GE

..

In b. 110 and 114 Chopin initially wrote short accents over the R.H. chords in AF; eventually, he wrote the marks between the staves. However, the new marks are longer and narrower, which makes them resemble long accents. According to us, Chopin could have adjusted the font of the marks to the small space between the chords of both hands. We consider both interpretations to be possible, yet to the main text we choose short accents, compliant with those present in rhythmically analogous b. 112 and 116. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents