b. 138-139
|
composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor
..
EEW1 and GE1no2 overlooked the hairpin. It is probably an oversight (in the case of EEW1 almost certainly – the signs were overlooked also in bars 140-141 and 142-144). The signs were added in EEW2 and GE2no2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 138
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The tie of e2 was added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE (→EE) as one of the three additions in the 2nd half of the bar (cf. notes on pedalling and sempre legato). It is a characteristic Chopin pianistic procedure, ensuring strict legato of a melody led in chords (cf. e.g. the Polonaise in Amajor, Op. 53, bar 97). We suggest this change also in bar 286. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 138
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE (→EE1) is almost certainly a result of an oversight of the engraver, although the lack of Chopin's intervention both in the subsequent proofreading of FE and the pupils' copies is surprising. According to us, in the case of the proofreading of FE1, three changes in the 2nd half of the bar could have distracted Chopin to such an extent that, occupied with developing the details of the notation, he did not notice striking mistakes both at the beginning of the bar and in the next one, while the proofreading of FE2 was only of a random nature. Out of three pupils' copies, only FED bears traces of the 1st movement of the Concerto having been worked on with Chopin, so the lack of corrections is nothing particular, especially that also there Chopin took care of correcting mistakes in immediate vicinity (in bar 139). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
|||||
b. 138-140
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Adding slurs in the L.H., modelled after the recapitulation (bars 286-288), is a deliberate revision of EE, in which sempre legato, added in FE, was omitted at the same time – see the adjacent note. The English editor would arbitrarily add slurs also in other pieces by Chopin, e.g. in the Nocturne in Dmajor, Op. 27 No. 2, bars 2-6. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
b. 138
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Chopin added the pedalling in the proofreading of FE (→EE). It is a third addition – next to the tie of e2 and sempre legato – introduced in this proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |