b. 391
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Moving the slur under the stave was certainly caused by graphic issues. The absence of the slur in GE3 can be explained by an oversight or revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 392
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing first slur must be an oversight of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
b. 393-394
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The curved line in FE is present only in the 2nd half of bar 393 (the last on a page), and it is unclear whether it runs from d1 or f1. In the face of the missing ending in bar 394, it is difficult to determine its nature – it can be a motivic slur combining d1-e1, like it was reproduced in GE1 (→GE2), or a tie of f1. The version of EE with two curved lines is probably arbitrary. In addition, it cannot be excluded that the very presence of a curved line in this place is a mistake; perhaps it was meant to be a tie of f1 in bar 392-393 – cf. the tie in bars 400-401 (it was considered erroneous probably in GE3). In the main text, we omit this unclear and dubious marking, which results in a version compliant with analogous bars 397-398. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 393-398
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In EE, f1 is tied both in bars 393-394 and 397-398. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 394-395
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The complete absence of slurs in these bars must be an oversight. In spite of that, slurs were added only in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |