|
b. 399-401
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
From the 2nd half of bar 399 on, five subsequent figures in the R.H. are devoid of slurs in GE1 (→GE2). The patent mistake was corrected in GE3. However, according to us, the roots of this mistake could have been found in FE, which is proven by the set of figures devoid of slurs in GE1 (→GE2) overlapping with the set of figures devoid of wedges on the topmost note. Such a compliance of mistakes most often points to their common origin, since committing the same or similar mistakes independently in the same place is highly unlikely. Therefore, most probably both slurs and wedges were overlooked in FE (or even in [A]), which was then corrected, but only with respect to slurs, in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 400-401
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In bar 401, the category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 400
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 402-403
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Four tritones in the L.H. are devoid of articulation markings in the sources. According to us, it is a result of the layout, in which those quavers are placed on the top stave under the semiquavers in the R.H. – even if Chopin managed to squeeze them between both parts in [A], the engraver could have considered it impossible to reproduce such a notation in print. In subsequent bars, respective dyads are already provided with staccato dots; therefore, in the main text we mark these four quavers in the same way. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||||
|
b. 402
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
in 
1-a1 crotchet, which is most probably an inaccuracy, since it cannot be justified in terms of sound. The notation was revised – in various ways – both in 
in 
before b1.