data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8754/d87542901ec59d50373e62fdeaa27658ebe3f57a" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/45570/45570130d3350cb196b62a10f420cd4f4b65d05c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/37010/37010d435308e935082eee8514e9080629ef4a1b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bd4d9/bd4d9cd00d2c1945c34810fe11464c16c7fb995e" alt=""
In A (→GE), three out of four analogous phrases – bars 18-19, 26-27 and 30-31 – have slurs beginning on a new bar, only in bars 22-23 Chopin originally notated the earlier beginning of the phrase. Chopin's corrections of FE (in bars 18-19 and 30-31) reversed the proportions: in three out of the four fragments mentioned the slurs begin on the accented crotchet on the 3rd beat of the previous bar. In such a situation we consider leaving bars 26-27 in an unchanged form to be an omission in proofing. Such omissions (leaving out one of several analogous fragments) often happened to Chopin, e.g. in the Prelude in F sharp minor Op. 28 no. 8, bar 17 or in the Polonaise in F sharp minor Op. 44, bar 70.
The earlier beginning of the slur was marked (although somewhat inaccurately) in EE.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions
issues: EE revisions, Omitted correction of an analogous place
notation: Slurs