Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 31
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The dynamic sign written in A was most probably overlooked in GE1 (→FE→EE), which was corrected in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The hairpins clearly written in A were inaccurately reproduced in GE1 (→FE). That shorter mark was then arbitrarily supplemented in EE by adding . The notation of A was restored in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
b. 32
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The omission of in the editions is probably due to oversight on the part of the engraver of GE (→FE→EE). However, as Chopin's correction of GE1 cannot be ruled out we suggest a variant proposal with the hairpins in brackets. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
A distinct wedge in A was – like all others – reproduced in GE as a staccato dot. In FE (→EE) the sign was omitted. A trace visible in FE may mean the deletion of the dot, but as we are not quite sure, in the main text we give the wedge written by Chopin in A category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 33
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
An obvious long accent in A was reproduced in the editions as a short one. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |