Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 1
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The absence of the dot is probably due to oversight on the part of the engraver of GE. Still, as we cannot rule out the possibility that the correction was made by Chopin, we give the dot in parentheses as optional. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
We give the extent of in line with A. Those hairpins are visibly shorter in GE and FE (→EE). Cf. the characteristics of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
b. 4
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
In EE, a long accent was added under b flat2, probably on the basis of the sign visible in FE in analogous bar 28. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 5
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The accent over a1 is doubtless a long one in A; this is testified by the change made in GE2 (probably after a repeated analysis of A). The sign in FE is not quite clear, yet it resembles a long accent more than a short one. In spite of that, EE has a short accent over the note in question. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||
b. 6
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
Chopin introduced a number of changes when correcting FE, also in performance markings. Here, however, it is almost certain that the hairpin was accidentally reversed by the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Sign reversal |