Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 36
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The dot in A may be a staccato dot, but as we cannot be sure, we give it in parentheses to be applied at the performer's discretion. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The dynamic mark in A resembles a long accent. Yet, taking into account the marking of an analogous phrase two bars earlier, it can be considered diminuendo hairpins, and was interpreted as such in GE (→FE→EE). Anyway, the difference between the two interpretations is more academic than practical, both from the graphic and the performance-related point of view. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Long accents , Unclear hairpins in A |
||||||||
b. 37
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The shape of the accent in A makes it resemble a short accent (a relatively wide angle between the arms), but it has the size of a long accent. The syncopated longer rhythmic value of the accented note makes us believe it was meant to be a long accent, yet the editions have a short accent here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
||||||||
b. 38
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The wedge of A was rendered as a staccato dot in GE. In FE (→EE) the sign was omitted altogether, probably due to the engraver's mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 39
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |