Slurs
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The slur in A is written inaccurately. For the edited text we adopt the interpretation of GE (→FE→EE), which may have been accepted by Chopin. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 14-15
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
The slur in A was corrected, probably by Chopin, in GE. It is difficult to decide whether that signified a change in suggested performance of that detail or was simply a correction of the inaccurately written sign. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 14
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
 
category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||
b. 15
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
Chopin wrote his slurs in A with extra care, he even lengthened the first slur visibly. Nonetheless, the slurs were printed in a distorted form in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A |
|||||
b. 16-17
|
composition: Op. 27 No 2, Nocturne in D♭ major
..
When read literally in A, the slurs in the indicated place and at the transition point between bar 16 and bar 17 do not reach the last notes in three-note motifs. This was recognized as an instance of inaccurate notation and correctly interpreted already in GE. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |