mUltimate Chopin

Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in GE

b. 92-93

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur in FE (→EE)

No slur in GE
..

There is no motivic slur for the bass sequence in GE, since the mark was interpreted as a tie of c1. See the next note.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 93

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Hairpin in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE
..

The missing  hairpin in GE is most probably a mistake of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 99

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

c2 in FE (→GE1,EE)

as1 w FEJ

b1 in GE2
..

c2 as the last semiquaver in FE (→GE1,EE) is most probably a mistake – cf. analogous bar 251. It is confirmed by the Chopinesque correction performed in pencil in FEJ. In turn, the reviser of GE2 removed the harmonic inconsistency with the L.H. part, yet he did not take into account the melodic structure of the figuration.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FEJ

b. 118

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In GE, there is no ending of the slur in the L.H. on a new line. It is a mistake of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 185-186

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

3 accents in FE (→EE)

No marks in GE
..

In GE, three accents are missing in the R.H. undoubtedly because of the engraver's oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE