|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The slurs of A are unclear in the 2nd group of semiquavers: when interpreted literally, the first embraces the first two notes while the second the last three. A comparison with adjacent, analogically structured figures unambiguously shows that it is the second slur that starts inaccurately (too late). In GE1 (→FE→EE) a less likely interpretation was adopted, in which each slur embraces three notes. In GE2 two slurs were replaced with one (cf. the 1st note in this bar). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the sources there is no category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Accidentals in different octaves , Errors in GE , Inaccuracies in A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Three accents in A are of a different length: the first can be safely assumed to be long, yet the classification of the next two is unclear. We assume that they are long accents, since there are no musical reasons for them to be equal (actually, they are much bigger than the accent in the R.H. in the previous bar). This is how they were interpreted in GE1, which, however, was not reproduced both in FE and GE2. EE used vertical accents, which is quite a frequent revision in that edition. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 23
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
returning a
2, which is a patent inaccuracy.
in 
