data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 25-26
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In FE (same as in our transcripts) bar 26 falls on a new line. The division of the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE , Hairpins denoting continuation |
||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
One can ponder whether Chopin did not try to change the notation of this ornament from small quavers to semiquavers: in bar 7 already in GE1 and here in FE (→EE). It cannot be excluded, yet taking into account the unobvious difference between two notations, we consider an inaccuracy of the engravers to be a more likely explanation of these changes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
An earlier beginning of the slur in the L.H. in GE1 (→FE→EE) is certainly a result of inaccuracy of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |