b. 26-27
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text we give the pedalling of A, since the authenticity of the addition introduced in GE1 (→FE→EE) is uncertain. The doubts are raised by an inaccurate alignment of indications in this bar, the absence of the sign in the previous one and a clumsy arrangement of the 1st beat of the bar. If, e.g. a sequence of signs at the transition between bars 26 and 27 was originally printed as a whole in bar 27 (considering the 2nd quaver to be the beginning of the bar), Chopin could have added only the most sonically striking mistake, which was the omission of the sign at the beginning of bar 27. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Omission of the sign in GE1 (→FE) is certainly a mistake. The sign was added in EE (arbitrarily) and GE2 (after A). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , No pedal release mark |
|||||||||||
b. 26-28
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
Omission of staccato dots under (over) the bass notes is certainly a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1 (→FE→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 27-28
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
..
It is difficult to say whether the earlier beginning of the 1st slur in bar 27 and both in bar 28 in EE is an inaccuracy or a revision coming from the conviction that the notation of FE is inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 28
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |